<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commenting on Relevant Blog Posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://morechristlike.com/commenting-on-relevant-blog-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://morechristlike.com/commenting-on-relevant-blog-posts/</link>
	<description>Changed into the same image</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dating website</title>
		<link>http://morechristlike.com/commenting-on-relevant-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>dating website</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morechristlike.com/?p=3925#comment-854</guid>
		<description>[Editor: Comment Spam Example]

&lt;strong&gt;I was going to write a similar blog concerning this topic, you beat me to it. You did a nice job! Thanks and well add your RSS to come categories on our blogs. Thanks so much, Jon B.&lt;/strong&gt;

[Editor: This is an example of comment spam. This general comment could be added to any blog article. I typically removed the link that is attached to the name (this is done in the backend of the blogging software) so that there isn&#039;t a link to the website the commenter is trying to promote and then post the domain name and note they are committing comment spam.  In this case I am not showing the domain as the pictures on dating sites are typically very immodest.

If you own a blog and get &quot;me to&quot; or &quot;good article&quot; comment spam the best thing in my opinion is to do is either delete them or out them.

You should be careful not to commit comment spam yourself. When making comments I make sure I have read through the post, address by name the person who wrote the post, make a comment concerning some point they have made in the blog post, and then post a link to a relevant article on my own blog and ask them to read it and give me feedback on it.

Most blog software by default adds a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nofollow tag&lt;/a&gt; to comments which tells the search engines not to give any ranking weight to the outbound link. This was done to discourage comment spam. Quality comments will still get your click through traffic, ranking weight and Pagerank vote from blogger that turn off the nofollow tag, and even when the nofollow tag is applied to the link I think the search engines still give you some ranking weight.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Editor: Comment Spam Example]</p>
<p><strong>I was going to write a similar blog concerning this topic, you beat me to it. You did a nice job! Thanks and well add your RSS to come categories on our blogs. Thanks so much, Jon B.</strong></p>
<p>[Editor: This is an example of comment spam. This general comment could be added to any blog article. I typically removed the link that is attached to the name (this is done in the backend of the blogging software) so that there isn't a link to the website the commenter is trying to promote and then post the domain name and note they are committing comment spam.  In this case I am not showing the domain as the pictures on dating sites are typically very immodest.</p>
<p>If you own a blog and get "me to" or "good article" comment spam the best thing in my opinion is to do is either delete them or out them.</p>
<p>You should be careful not to commit comment spam yourself. When making comments I make sure I have read through the post, address by name the person who wrote the post, make a comment concerning some point they have made in the blog post, and then post a link to a relevant article on my own blog and ask them to read it and give me feedback on it.</p>
<p>Most blog software by default adds a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow" rel="nofollow">nofollow tag</a> to comments which tells the search engines not to give any ranking weight to the outbound link. This was done to discourage comment spam. Quality comments will still get your click through traffic, ranking weight and Pagerank vote from blogger that turn off the nofollow tag, and even when the nofollow tag is applied to the link I think the search engines still give you some ranking weight.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mutch</title>
		<link>http://morechristlike.com/commenting-on-relevant-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morechristlike.com/?p=3925#comment-720</guid>
		<description>Hi Pseurge,

I edited out the 5 links in your post. You should only link to resources that are revelant to your comment post.

Mac OS Boot Camp doesn&#039;t include a windows xp or vista license.

Read &lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1461&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mac 101: Using Windows via Boot Camp with Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard&lt;/a&gt; and you will see that.

Requirements -- To use Boot Camp, you need:

1. An Intel-based Macintosh computer with a built-in or USB keyboard and a built-in trackpad or USB mouse.
2. Mac OS X 10.5 or later
3. The latest firmware updates available for your Intel-based Mac.
4. At least 10 GB of free space on your startup disk (single partition).
5. A full, single-disc version of Windows Vista, Windows XP Home Edition or Professional with Service Pack 2 or later. &lt;strong&gt;Boot Camp does not include Windows.&lt;/strong&gt; You must provide your own properly licensed installation disc. Important: A Windows XP installation disc must include Service Pack 2 (SP2). You cannot install an earlier version of Windows and upgrade to Windows XP, nor install an earlier version of Windows XP and update it to SP2.
6. Boot Camp Assistant (find it installed in /Applications/Utilities/ on Leopard).

Thanks!

Bob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pseurge,</p>
<p>I edited out the 5 links in your post. You should only link to resources that are revelant to your comment post.</p>
<p>Mac OS Boot Camp doesn&#8217;t include a windows xp or vista license.</p>
<p>Read <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1461" rel="nofollow">Mac 101: Using Windows via Boot Camp with Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard</a> and you will see that.</p>
<p>Requirements &#8212; To use Boot Camp, you need:</p>
<p>1. An Intel-based Macintosh computer with a built-in or USB keyboard and a built-in trackpad or USB mouse.<br />
2. Mac OS X 10.5 or later<br />
3. The latest firmware updates available for your Intel-based Mac.<br />
4. At least 10 GB of free space on your startup disk (single partition).<br />
5. A full, single-disc version of Windows Vista, Windows XP Home Edition or Professional with Service Pack 2 or later. <strong>Boot Camp does not include Windows.</strong> You must provide your own properly licensed installation disc. Important: A Windows XP installation disc must include Service Pack 2 (SP2). You cannot install an earlier version of Windows and upgrade to Windows XP, nor install an earlier version of Windows XP and update it to SP2.<br />
6. Boot Camp Assistant (find it installed in /Applications/Utilities/ on Leopard).</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Bob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pseurge</title>
		<link>http://morechristlike.com/commenting-on-relevant-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Pseurge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morechristlike.com/?p=3925#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Is it true? I&#039;ve had a mac os x for half a year now i didnt realize that windows actually came with it for free? thats what boot camp is right? so I decided that i want to set up boot camp but it asked me to back up my files first. i dont have an external source big enough to hold all my data. so i&#039;m wondering if its really a big deal? is there really a good chance that i will lose all my data?? thanks
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it true? I&#8217;ve had a mac os x for half a year now i didnt realize that windows actually came with it for free? thats what boot camp is right? so I decided that i want to set up boot camp but it asked me to back up my files first. i dont have an external source big enough to hold all my data. so i&#8217;m wondering if its really a big deal? is there really a good chance that i will lose all my data?? thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mutch</title>
		<link>http://morechristlike.com/commenting-on-relevant-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morechristlike.com/?p=3925#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike, 

First comment links give you traffic.  Some of the people that come may blog about the article or site and blog reviews don&#039;t have nofollows.  Also not all blogs have nofollows turned on. However I would hold while nofollow links are discounted I think they are still considered.

I posted on about 500 blogs for one project and the key phrase when from #400 to the first or send page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike, </p>
<p>First comment links give you traffic.  Some of the people that come may blog about the article or site and blog reviews don&#8217;t have nofollows.  Also not all blogs have nofollows turned on. However I would hold while nofollow links are discounted I think they are still considered.</p>
<p>I posted on about 500 blogs for one project and the key phrase when from #400 to the first or send page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristianismo Primitivo</title>
		<link>http://morechristlike.com/commenting-on-relevant-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristianismo Primitivo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morechristlike.com/?p=3925#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Hi Bob:
I was doing some research on this commenting, and it seems to me that it may not be as good a way to build ranking as it may seem.
For example, a lot of blog software automatically adds a [rel=&#039;external nofollow&#039;] tag to links in comments, like it did for my first comment (I checked the pagfe code to see).  That means the search engine will not give that link any &quot;link juice&quot;.  So while it may bring some traffic from interested readers, I understand that it will not add any ranking to the link.  Am I correct in this?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://codex.wordpress.org/Nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nofollow&lt;/a&gt; has some relevant information.
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob:<br />
I was doing some research on this commenting, and it seems to me that it may not be as good a way to build ranking as it may seem.<br />
For example, a lot of blog software automatically adds a [rel='external nofollow'] tag to links in comments, like it did for my first comment (I checked the pagfe code to see).  That means the search engine will not give that link any &#8220;link juice&#8221;.  So while it may bring some traffic from interested readers, I understand that it will not add any ranking to the link.  Am I correct in this?<br />
<a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Nofollow" rel="nofollow">Nofollow</a> has some relevant information.<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mutch</title>
		<link>http://morechristlike.com/commenting-on-relevant-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morechristlike.com/?p=3925#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Typically it is best with comments to only refer back to your site in the comments content if it is related to what you are posting about.  Otherwise people look at it as comment spam and some times will unapprove or not approve the comment or remove the link as I did : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typically it is best with comments to only refer back to your site in the comments content if it is related to what you are posting about.  Otherwise people look at it as comment spam and some times will unapprove or not approve the comment or remove the link as I did : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primitive Christianity</title>
		<link>http://morechristlike.com/commenting-on-relevant-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Primitive Christianity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morechristlike.com/?p=3925#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Hi Bro. Bob.
Thank you for the information.  I have began using this method, as you can see in this comment I now have gained two inbound links, one by my name, and the next one is to my Spanish page, El Cristianismo Primitivo.
Actually,  this is kind of a test to see if I have the technique perfected.  :-)
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bro. Bob.<br />
Thank you for the information.  I have began using this method, as you can see in this comment I now have gained two inbound links, one by my name, and the next one is to my Spanish page, El Cristianismo Primitivo.<br />
Actually,  this is kind of a test to see if I have the technique perfected.  :-)<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

